The debate rages still. Here is the current punch list of the qualities of both Director and haggis. Someday perhaps a definitive winner will emerge. Until then, we can only discuss this timeless subject over medium-sized flagons of malt beverage.
Discuss:
- Neither haggis nor Director are edible. 1
- You cannot code in haggis. If you did, it would be wet and messy. 1
- Use of Director frequently requires lubrication in the beer form to enhance productivity. 1
- Use of haggis frequently requires beer to make the user forget that they just ate haggis. 1
- Haggis is much more appealing when viewed in a web browser; Director apps generally become less so when put online. 2
- Haggis does not have logo requirements. 2
- Typing 'haggis' inside of Director 5's credit screen will cause the music to switch to a lovely bagpipe serenade; typing Director inside of haggis is seriously not suggested. (Try it) 3
|
|
NOT edible
CAN be used to write code
Usage has additional beer requirement
LESS appealing when viewed in a browser environment
Includes logo requirement
Typing "haggis" in Director 5's credits results in bagpipes being played
|
NOT edible
CANNOT be used to write code
Usage has additional beer requirement
MORE appealing when viewed in a browser environment
No logo requirement
Typing "Director" in haggis NOT recommended
|
1: Alex Zavatone
2: Warren Ockrassa
3: Buzz Kettles